2019 Laptop Comparison – ASUS Chromebook vs Microsoft Surface Go

This article compares my experiences using the Surface Go and an ASUS Chromebook alternatively for the last several months and reveals the winner.

The ASUS C302C Chromebook and the Microsoft Surface Go are similar devices in many ways. I’ll start with a summary of each including my personal pros and cons. I’ll finish on why I chose the Chromebook as my favourite.

ASUS C302C Chromebook

This device is very clean and a pleasure to use. It comes with an illuminated chiclet keyboard and a 12.5″ touchscreen. Memory (4 GB) and storage (32 or 64 GB) are not as critical as it uses Google Drive for storage. You need a Google account. The current price is $648 on Amazon.

ASUS C302C Chromebook

Pros

  • 12.5″ touchscreen. I’ve really become hooked on having a touchscreen to the point of missing it when I’m on any other laptop. I find 12.5″ is perfect for a travel laptop. It’s small enough to travel light, but is amazingly large when you prop it on your tray table on a plane.
  • Flip screen. This laptop screen flips over to become a tablet and rotates to portrait or landscape. It’s handier than I would have thought.
  • Illuminated keyboard. The keyboard is a joy to type on. The back lighting is brilliant.
  • Android. Adding Android to ChromeOS was genius and makes the Chromebook truly competitive with any other laptop out there. Keep in mind that Android is not available on all Chromebooks. This feature is such a game-changer that it’s worth checking before you buy; insist on Android support.
  • USB-C for charging and docking. Both the ASUS Chromebook and the Surface Go support USB-C charging and docking. That means I have one cable that connects my laptop to everything I need. It’s very convenient. The ASUS only charges through the USB-C connection, which means it comes with a very handy 45W USB-C charger. That charger can be used to charge my Surface Go or my Google Pixel phone.

Cons

  • Hardware Compatibility. It’s a little less compatible with things like printers and docking stations. I’ve gone through three docking stations and finally settled on one of the most expensive ones to work flawlessly with both my Chromebook and my Surface Go. Setting up the less common home printers can be a challenge, especially if they don’t support Google Cloud Print out of the box.
  • It’s not Windows. I do a lot of my work in Excel and, even though there are Android and web versions of Office, they don’t have all of the advanced macro capabilities of desktop (Windows) Office. There are also a few other Windows apps I rely on to run our business that aren’t available on the Chromebook. For those I’m forced to pull out my Surface Go or remotely connect to a Windows desktop.
  • You need a Google account. Most people have Google accounts but if you don’t want one you likely would not consider a Chromebook.
  • Some Technical Skill is helpful. The ChromeOS is much better than Linux as far as technical skill required to get the most from the operating system. Even so, I find that it requires the user to roll up their sleeves on occasion to accomplish some of the desirable tasks on the Chromebook. Examples include: enabling Android apps, toggling the touchpad on and off, configuring Google Cloud Print on a Brother printer.

Microsoft Surface Go

Until I started using the Chromebook, I absolutely loved the Surface Go. With its 10″ screen and light keyboard cover, it is the true definition of an ultra-portable. It weighs just over a pound and is small enough to take anywhere. The current bundle price (tablet and Type Cover keyboard) is $670 at Costco.

Microsoft Surface Go

Pros

  • Size – The size of the Surface Go is what attracted me to it in the first place. It brings back memories of my previously favourite laptop, the Dell Latitude X1, which by today’s standards looks bulky.
  • Windows 10 – Even though it comes pre-installed with Windows 10 S (essentially a stripped down version of Windows 10), you can easily take it out of S mode to turn it into Windows 10 Home. Windows 10 is also arguably more user friendly than ChromeOS, making it more suitable for non-technical users.
  • Touchscreen – Similar to the ASUS Chromebook, having a touchscreen is a luxury I never thought I’d use. Now that I’ve gotten used to it, I find it hard to go back to a non-touch laptop.
  • Removable keyboard – The Surface Type Cover is actually an extra purchased option (or bundled, such as this one from Costco), so the Surface Go is a tablet first, a laptop second. If you like it in tablet mode, being able to remove the keyboard (or flip it around so it’s more convenient to carry) is a bonus.

Cons

  • Keyboard – There are a few things I don’t like about the keyboard.
    1. The keys feel cheap and are “clicky”. I find it disruptive to type on it in a quiet meeting.
    2. Due to the size of the tablet, the keys on the Surface Go Type Cover are too close together for comfortable typing. If you have large hands, I imagine this would be even more uncomfortable.
    3. It’s flimsy. Unlike traditional laptops, the Surface devices are tablets. As such, the Type Covers do not support the tablet on a lap or other uneven surfaces.
  • Lack of Android – I never thought having Android on a laptop would be a key feature. It turns out that having Android on a Chromebook not only makes it on par with a Windows laptop, it elevates the Chromebook above Windows laptops in many ways.
  • Proprietary Charger. Thankfully the Surface Go also charges through the USB-C port, which enables me to use the same dock as I have for my Chromebook. The proprietary Surface charger is a waste. If you want a second charger, do yourself a favour a get a USB-C charger, like the one that came with the ASUS Chromebook. That way you can charge all things USB-C, not just your tablet.

Conclusion

After using both the ASUS Chromebook and the Surface Go for the last several months, my go-to device is definitely the Chromebook. In priority order, here’s why:

  • The keyboard – it is much more enjoyable typing on the ASUS Chromebook than the Type Cover of the Surface Go.
  • The size – for continuous use, I prefer a slightly larger screen size. 12.5″ is still plenty portable. 10″ is too small for prolonged use.

What about docked?
Even docked, I find my preference is the Chromebook. It’s a subtle difference, but when docked, I absolutely have to have an external keyboard with the Surface Go. That’s an extra step and inconvenience that’s unnecessary with the ASUS. Additionally, I use the laptop monitor as a secondary monitor when docked. The 12.5″ Chromebook screen does that much of a better job than the 10″ Surface Go screen.

What about Windows?
There are many times I just need a Windows laptop to get things done. In those cases, the Surface Go is plenty useful, particularly when docked. As I mentioned at the top of this post, I was convinced that it was the perfect desktop replacement, with it’s portability and dock-ability, until I started using the ASUS Chromebook. Interestingly, ASUS does not make a 12.5″ Windows laptop.

There are many other Windows laptops out there, including the Surface Laptop 2 or the Surface Pro. Curiously, both of these considerably higher end devices lack USB-C ports, which to me is a must-have. For now, the ASUS Chromebook suits me just fine.

Custom digital signage using PADS

We have recently had the opportunity to install arena schedule digital signage at the Don Hartman Northeast Sportsplex and Cardel Place in Calgary.  For both installations, we chose PADS 3.1 Standalone from Net Display Systems of the Netherlands.  The reason for our choice was the flexibility, ease of deployment and professional looking results of PADS.

One of the key features of the arena display solution is the integration with CLASS booking software.  Custom front-end databases were developed to read the CLASS information and allow display-specific customizations, such as dressing room assignments and home/visitor team names. This custom data is then accessed by the PADS software and presented on the display screens.  Other information, such as sports RSS feeds, custom messages, advertising and a TV tuner box are all incorporated on the high definition display.

The possibilities for custom public display systems are endless and the prices are continually dropping.  Contact us for more information about creating your own public area display system.

Antivirus that works – VIPRE Enterprise Premium

One of the latest challenges we’ve had with our clients is finding and implementing the right antivirus solution.  Over the years we’ve tried AVG, Trend Micro and most recently BitDefender.  While we continue to update and support these packages for our clients where the products are working effectively, for new installations we have been promoting VIPRE Enterprise Premium or VIPRE Antivirus Premium from Sunbelt Software as our Claritech standard.

NEWS FLASH: Microsoft has just announced that, starting in October, they are expanding their  previously home-only offer of a free version of Microsoft Security Essentials to businesses with less than 10 PCs.  The waters are muddy indeed…

The main reason that we’ve switched antivirus vendors so often in the last several years is that no one could seem to get it right.  Some of them are very light (AVG), some of them are quite comprehensive (Trend Micro) and some of them do a better job of catching viruses (BitDefender). None of them, until now, has done a great job at all three.

We’ve been following Sunbelt Software for several years through their informative newsletters and have always been interested in their products.  Counterspy was their first product that really got our attention, because it was one of the best at finding and eliminating spyware.   When VIPRE Antivirus emerged that combined the functionality of their antivirus, antispyware and a personal firewall (with the Premium version), it was decided that it was worth a try and we’ve been very impressed ever since.

One of the things we like about VIPRE is that it is relatively unknown, and is therefore not targeted by malware.  This also makes it somewhat difficult to find unbiased third-party reviews of the product.  One such review on PC Magazine rates VIPRE highly:

VIPRE is a very good standalone antivirus tool that outscores all but the very best of its competition in my tests. Those with more than three computers will love its $49.95 unlimited home license.

They do not include the Enterprise version in their review, but the Enterprise integration is definitely a key feature when installing in a corporate environment.

Another review can be found on the How To Geek website:

Vipre Anti-virus + Anti-Spyware is the best utility of its kind that I have used in a long time.  It is surprisingly light on system resources even while scanning, you won’t even know it’s running.  The liberal Home Site Licensing is very welcome for the user on a tight budget.  The cost of a one year unlimited license is $49.95 which covers all of the PC’s you have in the residence.  A cheaper license of $29.95 can be purchased for one machine.   If you are looking for a powerful security program that does not slow down your PC then Vipre is highly recommended.

Another great must-have antivirus product from Sunbelt Software is VIPRE PC Rescue.  This free version of VIPRE is updated daily as is intended to assist with the cleanup of infected PCs.  If it can’t be downloaded and run directly from the infected PC, it can be downloaded to a USB or CD drive and run from there.  (A trick to successfully running from a USB drive is to write-protect the drive before installing on the infected PC.)

In conclusion, for businesses with less than 10 PCs and no server you might want to take a look at Microsoft Security Essentials.  For those with a server or more than 10 PCs, a centralized AV solution such as VIPRE Enterprise is recommended.  Unless there is a compelling reason (such as performance, functionality or price) we do not recommend switching from your current AV product.

Google Apps – Is it right for your company?

I’ve been testing Google Apps Premier Edition for the last month and this note details my likes and dislikes about the service offering.   Overall, while I think Google Apps holds promise, its smartphone support is lacking and might not be the best choice for all companies.

Likes

  1. Multiple calendars – while at first I thought the lack of category capability was a bit of a pain, I’ve started to warm up to the concept of multiple calendars for tracking different types of appointments/events. The best part about the multiple calendars is that you can view them all on the same calendar view.  Different calendars are represented by different colours on the same view.
  2. Interesting calendars (sports teams, holidays, etc) – as part of my experimentation with multiple calendars, I noticed that there are numerous public interesting calendars available that can be easily integrated into Google Calendars.  Once you’ve subscribed to them, adding them to your calendar view is as easy as clicking a checkbox.
  3. Easy to setup – the Google Apps Setup Guide is detailed and easy to follow.
  4. Integration of your domain name – you can set it up with webmail.yourdomain.com, docs.yourdomain.com, calendar.yourdomain.com, etc.Continue reading

Two-Factor Part II – OpenID, VeriSign PIP and PhoneFactor

As you may already know, I am a huge believer in two-factor authentication.  You should keep in mind that two-factor authentication is not the absolute answer to Internet security problems.  It is critical that you keep your computer patched with current antivirus software and that you browse and use email with care.

I won’t get too much into the technology other than to say it involves using two of the three factors:  a) something you know,  b) something you have, and c) something you are. The majority of Internet two-factor authentication implementations use the first two factors, since determining something you are (such as a fingerprint or retinal image) involves considerably more logistics than is reasonable for a remote service.  The something you know portion of the system is trivial and widely accepted as username/password combinations.  Of course, password complexity is extremely important and will be the topic of a future post. That leaves us with something you have as the simplest and most common second factor.

It is worth noting that a second username/password combination can never be considered a second factor.  Theoretically, an infinite number of passwords is still part of something you know.  The primary reason that this is important is malware, particularly key-logging software.  This is the reason I am disappointed in PayPal’s two-factor implementation, as described in my previous post on the subject.  If you do implement two-factor authentication with PayPal, you should make sure you never bypass it or you risk exposing your account.

Continue reading

Yet another cool hosted service – Draftix.com

DraftixI recently had the opportunity to test another hosted service, Draftix.com.  I found it by searching for some software that would help with season ticket group distribution.  I was creating a new season ticket group of varying ownership and figured there had to be someone out there who’s already figured out how to do it easily using software or even Excel. 

After doing a quick Google or Bing (I’ve tried using Bing lately – maybe more on that in another post) I stumbled upon Draftix.  Interestingly, Bing provided the only direct path to Draftix- the second result, while Google (using the exact same “season ticket sharing software” query as linked to above) didn’t have a link to Draftix in the first 200 results (I gave up looking after 200).  Google’s second result did find a site (Vator.tv) that holds a review of Draftix that leads you to the Draftix site.  This is a perfect example of why relying on only one search provider (and Google is getting a lot of negative press about this lately) can limit your “view” of the Internet substantially.  An analogy would be if you rely 100% on one news service for all of your current events (The same kind of negative view a lot of people have of CNN.)Continue reading